Dior 536 Lucky vs NYX Maraschino
Dior 536 Lucky and NYX Maraschino are virtually identical (ΔE 1.6); Dior 536 Lucky is more saturated than NYX Maraschino.
Colour values
| Dior 536 Lucky | NYX Maraschino | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #DD2B47 | #D43748 |
| L* | 48.96 | 48.51 |
| a* | 67.20 | 61.18 |
| b* | 29.38 | 27.86 |
| Chroma | 73.35 | 67.23 |
| Hue angle | 23.62° | 24.48° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Red | Red |
| Finish | Satin | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.6 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.5 and chroma by 6.1; the hue angles are 0.9° apart. Taken together, Dior 536 Lucky reads more saturated than NYX Maraschino.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Dior 536 Lucky works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests NYX Maraschino works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.