Dior 536 Lucky vs Dior 875 Beverly Pink
Dior 536 Lucky and Dior 875 Beverly Pink are virtually identical (ΔE 1.1); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Dior 536 Lucky | Dior 875 Beverly Pink | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #DD2B47 | #DC2144 |
| L* | 48.96 | 47.91 |
| a* | 67.20 | 69.08 |
| b* | 29.38 | 29.85 |
| Chroma | 73.35 | 75.25 |
| Hue angle | 23.62° | 23.37° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Red | Red |
| Finish | Satin | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.1 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.1 and chroma by 1.9; the hue angles are 0.3° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Dior 536 Lucky works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Dior 875 Beverly Pink works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.