Dior 536 Lucky vs Dior 775 Darling
Dior 536 Lucky and Dior 775 Darling are virtually identical (ΔE 1.5); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Dior 536 Lucky | Dior 775 Darling | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #DD2B47 | #E1244B |
| L* | 48.96 | 49.23 |
| a* | 67.20 | 70.10 |
| b* | 29.38 | 27.49 |
| Chroma | 73.35 | 75.29 |
| Hue angle | 23.62° | 21.41° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Red | Red |
| Finish | Satin | Matte |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.5 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.3 and chroma by 1.9; the hue angles are 2.2° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Dior 536 Lucky works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Dior 775 Darling works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.