CoverGirl Wild Berry vs Marcelle Cleopatra
CoverGirl Wild Berry and Marcelle Cleopatra are virtually identical (ΔE 1.4); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| CoverGirl Wild Berry | Marcelle Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #8B3158 | #903459 |
| L* | 34.79 | 36.19 |
| a* | 42.02 | 42.41 |
| b* | -3.09 | -1.56 |
| Chroma | 42.14 | 42.44 |
| Hue angle | 355.79° | 357.89° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Deep | Medium-deep |
| Colour family | Berry | Berry |
| Finish | Satin | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.4 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.4 and chroma by 0.3; the hue angles are 2.1° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests CoverGirl Wild Berry works with cool and neutral undertones; its deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Marcelle Cleopatra works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium-deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.