L'Oreal Timeless Rose 115 vs Marienatie Tickled
L'Oreal Timeless Rose 115 and Marienatie Tickled are virtually identical (ΔE 0.4); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| L'Oreal Timeless Rose 115 | Marienatie Tickled | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #E89DA2 | #E89EA2 |
| L* | 72.15 | 72.38 |
| a* | 28.61 | 28.08 |
| b* | 8.84 | 9.17 |
| Chroma | 29.95 | 29.54 |
| Hue angle | 17.18° | 18.08° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Very light | Very light |
| Colour family | Nude | Nude |
| Finish | Satin | Gloss |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 0.4 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.2 and chroma by 0.4; the hue angles are 0.9° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests L'Oreal Timeless Rose 115 works with cool and neutral undertones; its very light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Colour theory suggests Marienatie Tickled works with cool and neutral undertones; its very light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Last verified . How we measure.