L'Oreal Julianne's Red vs Wet n Wild 125 Red-dy or Not
L'Oreal Julianne's Red and Wet n Wild 125 Red-dy or Not are virtually identical (ΔE 1.6); L'Oreal Julianne's Red is less saturated than Wet n Wild 125 Red-dy or Not.
Colour values
| L'Oreal Julianne's Red | Wet n Wild 125 Red-dy or Not | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #D82A37 | #DF1536 |
| L* | 47.67 | 47.62 |
| a* | 65.39 | 71.32 |
| b* | 37.05 | 37.96 |
| Chroma | 75.16 | 80.79 |
| Hue angle | 29.54° | 28.03° |
| Undertone | Neutral | Neutral |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Red | Red |
| Finish | Matte | Matte |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.6 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.1 and chroma by 5.6; the hue angles are 1.5° apart. Taken together, L'Oreal Julianne's Red reads less saturated than Wet n Wild 125 Red-dy or Not.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests L'Oreal Julianne's Red works with cool, neutral and warm undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Wet n Wild 125 Red-dy or Not works with cool, neutral and warm undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.