e.l.f. Ravishing Rose vs L'Oreal She's So Matte
e.l.f. Ravishing Rose and L'Oreal She's So Matte are virtually identical (ΔE 0.9); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| e.l.f. Ravishing Rose | L'Oreal She's So Matte | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #C55456 | #C15555 |
| L* | 50.55 | 50.09 |
| a* | 45.34 | 43.34 |
| b* | 21.66 | 21.52 |
| Chroma | 50.25 | 48.39 |
| Hue angle | 25.53° | 26.41° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Red | Red |
| Finish | Satin | Matte |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 0.9 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.5 and chroma by 1.9; the hue angles are 0.9° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests e.l.f. Ravishing Rose works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests L'Oreal She's So Matte works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.