Dior 653 Sequins vs Pacifica XOX
Dior 653 Sequins and Pacifica XOX are virtually identical (ΔE 1.2); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Dior 653 Sequins | Pacifica XOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #EC7A86 | #EB7583 |
| L* | 64.55 | 63.37 |
| a* | 44.98 | 46.80 |
| b* | 13.85 | 13.89 |
| Chroma | 47.06 | 48.82 |
| Hue angle | 17.12° | 16.53° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Light | Light |
| Colour family | Pink | Pink |
| Finish | Gloss | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.2 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.2 and chroma by 1.8; the hue angles are 0.6° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Dior 653 Sequins works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Colour theory suggests Pacifica XOX works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Last verified . How we measure.