Dior 162 MISS SATIN vs Revlon Flashing Lights
Dior 162 MISS SATIN and Revlon Flashing Lights are virtually identical (ΔE 0.8); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Dior 162 MISS SATIN | Revlon Flashing Lights | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #F08885 | #ED8984 |
| L* | 67.90 | 67.70 |
| a* | 39.23 | 37.50 |
| b* | 19.14 | 19.37 |
| Chroma | 43.65 | 42.21 |
| Hue angle | 26.01° | 27.31° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Light | Light |
| Colour family | Pink | Pink |
| Finish | Matte | Matte |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 0.8 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.2 and chroma by 1.4; the hue angles are 1.3° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Dior 162 MISS SATIN works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Colour theory suggests Revlon Flashing Lights works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Last verified . How we measure.