Dear Me Beauty Hydraglow Lip Stain (x Wilsen Willim) - Dear Laras vs Dior 644 Sydney
Dear Me Beauty Hydraglow Lip Stain (x Wilsen Willim) - Dear Laras and Dior 644 Sydney are virtually identical (ΔE 1.5); Dear Me Beauty Hydraglow Lip Stain (x Wilsen Willim) - Dear Laras is less saturated than Dior 644 Sydney.
Dear Me Beauty Hydraglow Lip Stain (x Wilsen Willim) - Dear Laras
Colour values
| Dear Me Beauty Hydraglow Lip Stain (x Wilsen Willim) - Dear Laras | Dior 644 Sydney | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #AF4042 | #B73E42 |
| L* | 43.03 | 44.10 |
| a* | 45.41 | 49.03 |
| b* | 23.14 | 24.80 |
| Chroma | 50.97 | 54.94 |
| Hue angle | 27.00° | 26.83° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium-deep | Medium-deep |
| Colour family | Red | Red |
| Finish | Gloss | Matte |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.5 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.1 and chroma by 4.0; the hue angles are 0.2° apart. Taken together, Dear Me Beauty Hydraglow Lip Stain (x Wilsen Willim) - Dear Laras reads less saturated than Dior 644 Sydney.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Dear Me Beauty Hydraglow Lip Stain (x Wilsen Willim) - Dear Laras works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium-deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Dior 644 Sydney works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium-deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.