ColourPop Bound vs e.l.f. Tea Rose
ColourPop Bound and e.l.f. Tea Rose are near-identical (ΔE 2.1); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| ColourPop Bound | e.l.f. Tea Rose | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #CF8D98 | #D1949C |
| L* | 65.42 | 67.38 |
| a* | 26.60 | 24.10 |
| b* | 4.41 | 5.01 |
| Chroma | 26.96 | 24.61 |
| Hue angle | 9.41° | 11.74° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Light | Light |
| Colour family | Mauve | Mauve |
| Finish | Satin | Matte |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 2.1 is in the “near-identical” band (from 2.0 to 3.5, a difference that shows mainly side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 2.0 and chroma by 2.4; the hue angles are 2.3° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests ColourPop Bound works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Colour theory suggests e.l.f. Tea Rose works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Last verified . How we measure.