Clinique Rose Shimmer vs IMAN Flirtatious
Clinique Rose Shimmer and IMAN Flirtatious are virtually identical (ΔE 1.6); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Clinique Rose Shimmer | IMAN Flirtatious | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #A8005B | #AF0061 |
| L* | 36.14 | 37.81 |
| a* | 62.58 | 64.67 |
| b* | -2.39 | -3.62 |
| Chroma | 62.63 | 64.77 |
| Hue angle | 357.81° | 356.80° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium-deep | Medium-deep |
| Colour family | Berry | Berry |
| Finish | Satin | Matte |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.6 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.7 and chroma by 2.1; the hue angles are 1.0° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Clinique Rose Shimmer works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium-deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests IMAN Flirtatious works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium-deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.