Clinique Pink-a-boo vs NYX Fig
Clinique Pink-a-boo and NYX Fig are virtually identical (ΔE 1.2); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Clinique Pink-a-boo | NYX Fig | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #E56D75 | #E36974 |
| L* | 60.68 | 59.62 |
| a* | 47.26 | 48.40 |
| b* | 18.06 | 17.13 |
| Chroma | 50.60 | 51.35 |
| Hue angle | 20.91° | 19.49° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Light | Light |
| Colour family | Pink | Red |
| Finish | Gloss | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.2 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.1 and chroma by 0.8; the hue angles are 1.4° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Clinique Pink-a-boo works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Colour theory suggests NYX Fig works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Last verified . How we measure.