Clinique Go-Go Pop vs Dior 684 Diabolo
Clinique Go-Go Pop and Dior 684 Diabolo are near-identical (ΔE 2.1); Clinique Go-Go Pop is more saturated than Dior 684 Diabolo.
Colour values
| Clinique Go-Go Pop | Dior 684 Diabolo | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #EF005F | #E60760 |
| L* | 50.90 | 49.28 |
| a* | 78.90 | 76.39 |
| b* | 18.03 | 14.91 |
| Chroma | 80.93 | 77.83 |
| Hue angle | 12.87° | 11.05° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Pink | Pink |
| Finish | Satin | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 2.1 is in the “near-identical” band (from 2.0 to 3.5, a difference that shows mainly side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.6 and chroma by 3.1; the hue angles are 1.8° apart. Taken together, Clinique Go-Go Pop reads more saturated than Dior 684 Diabolo.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Clinique Go-Go Pop works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Dior 684 Diabolo works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.