Clinique Fab Pop vs NYX Sweet 16
Clinique Fab Pop and NYX Sweet 16 are virtually identical (ΔE 1.7); Clinique Fab Pop is deeper than NYX Sweet 16.
Colour values
| Clinique Fab Pop | NYX Sweet 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #FB8187 | #FF888C |
| L* | 67.99 | 70.01 |
| a* | 46.92 | 45.36 |
| b* | 18.39 | 18.46 |
| Chroma | 50.40 | 48.97 |
| Hue angle | 21.40° | 22.15° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Light | Very light |
| Colour family | Pink | Pink |
| Finish | Satin | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 1.7 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 2.0 and chroma by 1.4; the hue angles are 0.8° apart. Taken together, Clinique Fab Pop reads deeper than NYX Sweet 16.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Clinique Fab Pop works with cool and neutral undertones; its light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Colour theory suggests NYX Sweet 16 works with cool and neutral undertones; its very light depth sits most naturally on fair, light and medium skin.
Last verified . How we measure.