Clinique Blushing Pop vs Clinique Cocoa Pop
Clinique Blushing Pop and Clinique Cocoa Pop are near-identical (ΔE 2.1); Clinique Blushing Pop is cooler and less saturated than Clinique Cocoa Pop.
Colour values
| Clinique Blushing Pop | Clinique Cocoa Pop | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #9F5859 | #A65957 |
| L* | 45.73 | 46.90 |
| a* | 29.26 | 31.25 |
| b* | 12.38 | 15.34 |
| Chroma | 31.77 | 34.82 |
| Hue angle | 22.93° | 26.14° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Red | Red |
| Finish | Matte | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 2.1 is in the “near-identical” band (from 2.0 to 3.5, a difference that shows mainly side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 1.2 and chroma by 3.1; the hue angles are 3.2° apart. Taken together, Clinique Blushing Pop reads cooler and less saturated than Clinique Cocoa Pop.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Clinique Blushing Pop works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Clinique Cocoa Pop works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.