Boosh Leah vs Clinique Sugar Pop
Boosh Leah and Clinique Sugar Pop are virtually identical (ΔE 0.9); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Boosh Leah | Clinique Sugar Pop | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #C86775 | #CC6674 |
| L* | 55.35 | 55.69 |
| a* | 39.88 | 41.73 |
| b* | 10.01 | 11.16 |
| Chroma | 41.12 | 43.20 |
| Hue angle | 14.09° | 14.98° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Medium | Medium |
| Colour family | Pink | Pink |
| Finish | Satin | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 0.9 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.3 and chroma by 2.1; the hue angles are 0.9° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Boosh Leah works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Clinique Sugar Pop works with cool and neutral undertones; its medium depth sits most naturally on fair, light, medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.