Benefit fling thing vs Dior 967 Gotha
Benefit fling thing and Dior 967 Gotha are virtually identical (ΔE 0.8); in lightness, saturation and warmth they are nearly indistinguishable.
Colour values
| Benefit fling thing | Dior 967 Gotha | |
|---|---|---|
| Hex | #7D2034 | #7A2335 |
| L* | 28.49 | 28.37 |
| a* | 41.04 | 38.89 |
| b* | 11.17 | 10.25 |
| Chroma | 42.53 | 40.21 |
| Hue angle | 15.22° | 14.76° |
| Undertone | Cool | Cool |
| Depth | Deep | Deep |
| Colour family | Red | Berry |
| Finish | Satin | Satin |
What the numbers mean: ΔE 0.8 is in the “virtually identical” band (up to 2.0, a difference that is hard to see even side by side). Lightness (L*) differs by 0.1 and chroma by 2.3; the hue angles are 0.5° apart. None of these differences is large enough to name a direction, so the two read alike in lightness, saturation and warmth.
Who they suit
Colour theory suggests Benefit fling thing works with cool and neutral undertones; its deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Colour theory suggests Dior 967 Gotha works with cool and neutral undertones; its deep depth sits most naturally on medium, tan and deep skin.
Last verified . How we measure.